What is the Review Judgment skill?

It is a specialized framework that allows Claude Code to evaluate and act on feedback from AI code review tools based on specific project criteria.

Does it prioritize security issues?

Yes, security risks like SQL injection or authentication flaws are always categorized as 'ACCEPT' criteria within this skill.

How does it handle rejected suggestions?

The skill instructs Claude to log a clear justification for why a suggestion was not applied, ensuring transparency in the development process.

Why should I use an AI judge for code reviews?

It prevents AI agents from blindly following suggestions that might violate your project's architecture, styling rules, or defined scope.

Which review tools is this compatible with?

While designed with CodeRabbit and GitHub Copilot in mind, it can be used to evaluate feedback from any automated linting or review tool.

AI Code Review Judgment

Name: AI Code Review Judgment
Author: Yuji181181

byYuji181181

Collaboration Tools

Evaluates and filters AI-generated code review suggestions to maintain architectural integrity and technical priority.

About

The Review Judgment skill empowers Claude to act as a discerning judge when processing feedback from automated code review tools like CodeRabbit or GitHub Copilot. It provides a standardized framework for accepting critical improvements—such as security fixes, bug resolutions, and performance optimizations—while systematically rejecting suggestions that violate layered architecture patterns, styling configurations, or project scope. This ensures your codebase remains consistent with its intended design while automating the filter of high-volume AI review comments.

Key Features

Automatic filtering of out-of-scope refactoring requests
Architectural enforcement for layered Next.js applications
Style preference validation against Biome and project configs
0 GitHub stars
Strict criteria for accepting security and performance fixes
Mandatory audit logging for rejected review suggestions

Use Cases

Maintaining architectural boundaries in complex Next.js projects
Filtering automated PR comments from tools like CodeRabbit or Copilot
Reducing noise in AI-driven development workflows

About

Key Features

Automatic filtering of out-of-scope refactoring requests
Architectural enforcement for layered Next.js applications
Style preference validation against Biome and project configs
0 GitHub stars
Strict criteria for accepting security and performance fixes
Mandatory audit logging for rejected review suggestions

Use Cases

Maintaining architectural boundaries in complex Next.js projects
Filtering automated PR comments from tools like CodeRabbit or Copilot
Reducing noise in AI-driven development workflows