What should I do if the AI reviewer makes a mistake?

The skill includes a protocol for pushing back with technical reasoning, allowing you to provide code examples or test results that justify your implementation.

Is this skill mandatory for every small change?

While optional for minor tweaks, it is highly recommended after completing major features or subtasks to prevent technical debt from compounding.

Why should I use a subagent for code reviews?

Using a code-reviewer subagent provides an objective, fresh perspective on your changes, helping to catch logical errors and maintainability issues that you might overlook while coding.

How does feedback prioritization work?

Feedback is categorized into Critical (must fix now), Important (fix before moving to the next task), and Minor (can be noted for future tech debt sessions).

How does the skill define what code to review?

It utilizes git SHAs (Base and Head) to specify the exact range of commits that require analysis, ensuring the reviewer focuses only on the relevant changes.

Automated Code Review Orchestrator

Name: Automated Code Review Orchestrator
Author: Cygnusfear

byCygnusfear

Collaboration Tools

Streamlines the code review process by dispatching specialized subagents to analyze changes and identify issues before merging.

About

The Requesting Code Review skill provides a structured framework for performing early and frequent code audits within Claude Code. By automating the identification of git SHAs and utilizing the code-reviewer subagent, it helps developers catch architectural flaws, bugs, and performance issues before they cascade into the main codebase. It is specifically designed to support subagent-driven development, ensuring that every task is validated against requirements through a categorized feedback loop of critical, important, and minor improvements.

Key Features

Structured push-back mechanism for technical disagreements
Standardized review templates for consistent feedback
Categorized issue reporting (Critical, Important, Minor)
0 GitHub stars
Automated Git SHA tracking for precise diff analysis
Seamless integration with subagent-driven development workflows

Use Cases

Obtaining a fresh perspective on complex bug fixes or refactoring logic
Performing incremental reviews after finishing individual tasks in a multi-step plan
Ensuring feature completion meets requirements before merging into the main branch

About

Key Features

Structured push-back mechanism for technical disagreements
Standardized review templates for consistent feedback
Categorized issue reporting (Critical, Important, Minor)
0 GitHub stars
Automated Git SHA tracking for precise diff analysis
Seamless integration with subagent-driven development workflows

Use Cases

Obtaining a fresh perspective on complex bug fixes or refactoring logic
Performing incremental reviews after finishing individual tasks in a multi-step plan
Ensuring feature completion meets requirements before merging into the main branch