How does this skill differ from standard linters?

Linters focus on syntax and formatting, while this skill evaluates logic, architecture, security, and design complexity that automated tools often miss.

Does it support specific programming languages?

The checklist is language-agnostic, focusing on universal engineering principles like the single responsibility principle and complexity management.

Can I use this for self-review?

Yes, it is designed for both reviewing others' pull requests and self-evaluating your own changes before you push them to a repository.

How long does a typical review take with this skill?

The checklist is optimized for speed, allowing Claude to provide a comprehensive evaluation of typical pull requests in less than five minutes.

What are the 'Red Flags' mentioned in the skill?

Red flags are specific indicators of poor code quality, such as deep nesting, generic names like 'Manager', or missing security checks in sensitive logic.

Code Review Checklist

Name: Code Review Checklist
Author: phrazzld

byphrazzld

•

Collaboration Tools

Implements a comprehensive, high-standard code review framework to evaluate pull requests for design, security, and performance.

About

This skill empowers Claude to act as a rigorous peer reviewer, applying a structured checklist to ensure code changes are maintainable, secure, and performant. Beyond simple syntax checks, it evaluates architectural complexity using principles like the Ousterhout Question and the Torvalds Standard. It helps developers catch subtle design flaws, handle edge cases, and ensure proper documentation before merging code, making it an essential tool for maintaining high codebase quality in under five minutes per review.

Key Features

2 GitHub stars
Detailed guidance for handling edge cases and type safety.
Fast, focused review process designed for sub-5 minute completion.
Categorized feedback tiers: Stop/Fix, Request Changes, Suggest, and Approve.
Architectural complexity assessment using the Ousterhout Question.
Multi-dimensional evaluation covering security, performance, and correctness.

Use Cases

Self-reviewing local changes before committing to ensure high quality.
Automating initial peer reviews for pull requests to flag common issues.
Pair programming guidance to discuss architectural decisions and patterns.

About

Key Features

2 GitHub stars
Detailed guidance for handling edge cases and type safety.
Fast, focused review process designed for sub-5 minute completion.
Categorized feedback tiers: Stop/Fix, Request Changes, Suggest, and Approve.
Architectural complexity assessment using the Ousterhout Question.
Multi-dimensional evaluation covering security, performance, and correctness.

Use Cases

Self-reviewing local changes before committing to ensure high quality.
Automating initial peer reviews for pull requests to flag common issues.
Pair programming guidance to discuss architectural decisions and patterns.