When should I trigger a code review using this skill?

It is recommended to request a review after completing any major feature, after every task in a subagent-driven workflow, and always before merging to the main branch.

How does the skill identify which code to review?

The skill uses Git SHAs to define a range of commits, allowing the subagent to focus specifically on the changes implemented between the BASE_SHA and HEAD_SHA.

What happens if the subagent provides incorrect feedback?

The workflow encourages pushing back with technical reasoning or providing tests that prove the code works as intended, ensuring the review is a collaborative process.

Can this skill be integrated into existing CI/CD plans?

Yes, it is designed to fit into plan-based development where reviews are conducted after specific batches of tasks to prevent issues from cascading.

Requesting Code Review

Name: Requesting Code Review
Author: LyQing63

byLyQing63

Collaboration Tools

Automates the dispatch of code-reviewing subagents to verify implementation quality and catch architectural issues before merging code.

About

The Requesting Code Review skill provides a structured framework for Claude to initiate self-correcting workflows by invoking specialized subagents. By utilizing Git SHAs to isolate specific changes, this skill ensures that every task—from minor bug fixes to major feature implementations—is analyzed against requirements and best practices. It acts as a vital quality gate in subagent-driven development, allowing developers to identify critical errors early, maintain architectural consistency, and proceed with confidence through complex deployment plans.

Key Features

Precise diff analysis via Git SHA integration
Standardized review prompts for consistent code quality assessments
Workflow integration for subagent-driven development cycles
Automated subagent dispatch using specialized review templates
0 GitHub stars
Tiered feedback system identifying Critical, Important, and Minor issues

Use Cases

Gaining a fresh perspective on complex bug fixes or refactoring efforts
Verifying feature completion after each task in a development plan
Performing final quality checks before merging branches into main

About

Key Features

Precise diff analysis via Git SHA integration
Standardized review prompts for consistent code quality assessments
Workflow integration for subagent-driven development cycles
Automated subagent dispatch using specialized review templates
0 GitHub stars
Tiered feedback system identifying Critical, Important, and Minor issues

Use Cases

Gaining a fresh perspective on complex bug fixes or refactoring efforts
Verifying feature completion after each task in a development plan
Performing final quality checks before merging branches into main