Can it run tests after making changes?

Yes, the workflow specifically includes a validation step to run affected tests and linting checks like ruff before marking a task as complete.

What happens if the reviewer feedback is ambiguous?

The skill is instructed to clarify ambiguous items with the user before starting implementation to prevent incorrect code changes.

How does this skill handle multiple review comments?

It parses individual feedback items into a structured todo list, ensuring each point is addressed one-by-one with real-time status updates.

Does it create git commits for the changes?

It uses conventional commits for any changes it implements, ensuring a clean and professional version control history.

Does it support specific coding styles?

It follows the project's specific conventions defined in CLAUDE.md and adheres to standard practices like PEP 604/585 for type hints.

Review Feedback Implementation

Name: Review Feedback Implementation
Author: pur3v4d3r

bypur3v4d3r

•

Collaboration Tools

Automates the parsing, tracking, and systematic application of code review feedback and PR suggestions.

About

This skill streamlines the often tedious process of addressing reviewer comments by converting raw feedback into a structured, trackable todo list. It guides Claude to systematically navigate the codebase, apply requested changes following project conventions, verify implementations through testing, and maintain real-time progress updates. By enforcing a one-task-at-a-time workflow, it ensures that every piece of feedback is addressed thoroughly without missing edge cases or breaking existing functionality.

Key Features

Automated parsing of numbered or bulleted reviewer comments
Real-time progress tracking with single-task execution focus
1 GitHub stars
Dynamic todo list creation and management with TodoWrite
Context-aware code modification following CLAUDE.md standards
Integrated validation using project-specific testing and linting tools

Use Cases

Refactoring code based on architectural guidance provided in review comments
Addressing a comprehensive list of feedback items from a GitHub Pull Request
Systematically implementing suggestions from manual peer review notes

About

Key Features

Automated parsing of numbered or bulleted reviewer comments
Real-time progress tracking with single-task execution focus
1 GitHub stars
Dynamic todo list creation and management with TodoWrite
Context-aware code modification following CLAUDE.md standards
Integrated validation using project-specific testing and linting tools

Use Cases

Refactoring code based on architectural guidance provided in review comments
Addressing a comprehensive list of feedback items from a GitHub Pull Request
Systematically implementing suggestions from manual peer review notes