How does it prioritize multiple feedback items?

It follows a strict order: clarify everything first, then address blocking/security issues, followed by simple fixes, and finally complex refactoring, testing each change individually.

What is performative agreement in code reviews?

It refers to using phrases like 'You're absolutely right!' or 'Great point!' which add social fluff without technical value. This skill replaces these with technical acknowledgments or direct actions.

How does this skill handle unclear feedback?

It instructs Claude to stop and ask for clarification on all items before implementing any changes, ensuring that related items aren't misunderstood or partially implemented.

When will Claude push back on a reviewer's suggestion?

Claude will push back if a suggestion breaks existing functionality, lacks context, violates YAGNI principles, is technically incorrect for the stack, or conflicts with established architectural decisions.

Technical Code Review Reception

Name: Technical Code Review Reception
Author: julianromli

byjulianromli

•

101

•

Collaboration Tools

Standardizes how Claude processes code review feedback by prioritizing technical verification and objective implementation over social agreement.

This skill equips Claude with a rigorous framework for handling code review suggestions from both human partners and external reviewers. It shifts the interaction from performative politeness to technical precision, ensuring that changes are only implemented after they have been verified against the actual codebase. By enforcing clarifying questions, YAGNI checks, and structured implementation orders, it prevents regressions and architectural bloat caused by blind adherence to feedback.

Key Features

01Structured multi-item implementation and testing logic

02Verification-first feedback processing workflow

03Elimination of performative and redundant polite responses

04YAGNI verification to prevent unnecessary feature implementation

05101 GitHub stars

06Technical push-back framework for incorrect suggestions

Use Cases

01Maintaining codebase integrity against unnecessary 'best practice' bloat

02Processing complex PR feedback from multiple stakeholders

03Handling ambiguous or contradictory change requests with clarification

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add julianromli/opencode-template receiving-code-review

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT

Download Skill