Technical Code Review Response

About

This skill optimizes how Claude handles code review feedback by implementing a structured, verification-first workflow. It replaces performative agreement and sycophantic responses with technical evaluation, ensuring that every suggestion is checked against codebase reality and YAGNI principles before implementation. It is particularly useful for maintaining architectural integrity when dealing with external reviewers, handling complex multi-item feedback, and preventing the introduction of unnecessary 'professional' features that aren't actually required by the project.

Key Features

• 0 GitHub stars
• Context-aware pushback protocols for incorrect or conflicting suggestions
• Automated elimination of performative agreement and gratitude fluff
• YAGNI-based evaluation of suggested features and refactors
• Strict clarification workflows for ambiguous or multi-part feedback
• Structured six-step response pattern for technical verification

Use Cases

• Processing high-volume feedback from external open-source contributors
• Evaluating complex architectural suggestions from senior human partners
• Maintaining codebase leaness by filtering out unused feature suggestions