Does this skill help with risk management?

Yes, Step 5 of the execution protocol specifically evaluates known issues, edge cases, security vulnerabilities, and scalability concerns.

Where are the validation logs stored?

Upon completion, the skill automatically records a summary of the target, score, and recommendations into a session log file located in the .sessions/ directory.

What is the 150% Check Rule?

It is a validation protocol that ensures 100% of core requirements are met while adding a 50% enhancement check covering edge cases, best practices, and mitigation strategies.

When should I use the Validate-Integrity skill?

This skill should be invoked before any significant delivery, after completing major feature implementations, or when you need a confidence check before handing work off.

How does the quality score work?

The skill provides a numeric rating from 0-100. Scores between 95-100 are excellent, while scores below 75 indicate that minor or significant issues exist that should be fixed before delivery.

Validate-Integrity 150

Name: Validate-Integrity 150
Author: MykhailoDmytriakha

byMykhailoDmytriakha

Security & Testing

Validates work quality and goal alignment through a rigorous final self-check protocol before delivery.

About

The Validate-Integrity 150 skill provides a structured framework for Claude to perform an exhaustive final review of any completed task. It evaluates outputs across four key dimensions—goal alignment, completeness, correctness, and risk assessment—ensuring that every deliverable not only meets core requirements but also accounts for edge cases and future-proofing. By generating an objective 0-100 quality score and a detailed delivery status report, this skill minimizes post-delivery errors and identifies exactly what needs to be fixed before a project is considered complete.

Key Features

Multi-dimensional verification of goal alignment and technical accuracy
Comprehensive risk assessment identifying edge cases and vulnerabilities
Automated session logging to track validation results and delivery status
Standardized 0-100 quality scoring system with objective reasoning
Structured self-critique to uncover improvements and alternative approaches
0 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Reviewing complex documentation or feature implementations for completeness
Conducting a final quality audit before deploying code to production
Verifying that a task meets all client requirements before manual handoff

About

Key Features

Multi-dimensional verification of goal alignment and technical accuracy
Comprehensive risk assessment identifying edge cases and vulnerabilities
Automated session logging to track validation results and delivery status
Standardized 0-100 quality scoring system with objective reasoning
Structured self-critique to uncover improvements and alternative approaches
0 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Reviewing complex documentation or feature implementations for completeness
Conducting a final quality audit before deploying code to production
Verifying that a task meets all client requirements before manual handoff